When NOT to Make Offerings
Readers, please enjoy this guest blog post by Aaron Leitch, author of several books, including Secrets of the Magickal Grimoires, The Angelical Language Volume I and Volume II, and Essential Enochian Grimoire.
The ritual use of offerings, especially in (but not limited to) the form of food items, is one of those “lost secrets of Western magick” you’ve likely heard me talk about before. A lot. It is an art I learned very slowly, over many years, but it was more than worth the effort. Knowing what to offer, what not to offer, when to offer, how to offer, and how all of these things will influence the spiritual being I am working with has been a “game changer” in my practice—as well as the practices of many others who have explored this method of magick.
In my writings on the subject, I have tended toward describing ritual offerings as a form of payment to the spirit. It not only shows fairness toward the entity, but also provides it with the energy necessary to accomplish your goal. I’ve compared it many times to hiring a contractor—you must negotiate a deal and make the payment, or else why would the contractor do any work for you? Even if you pay the spirit after the work is done—a common practice is to make a small offering before, with the promise of a larger payment afterward—it still acts as an energy exchange that gives the spirit what it needs to make changes in the physical world.
But, of course, not everything is so simple. A member of my Solomonic Group on Facebook recently pointed out an anomaly in the spirit-conjuring grimoire called the Goetia. Apparently, the mighty president Malphas should not be given “sacrifice,” as he will accept it “kindly and willingly, but will deceive him that does it.” This strikes me as counter-intuitive on the surface: is it saying that Malphas is willing to work for free, and will react negatively if you do try to pay him??
If this statement had been made elsewhere in the book—say with the magical considerations—or if it had even been phrased in a more universal manner, one could chock it up to the usual anti-Pagan Christian rhetoric. After all, Christian orthodoxy insists that no sacrifice or offering should ever be made to any spirit, for any reason; and it would hardly be the first grimoire to follow that line of thought. (See the Book of Abramelin, for example.) However, the Goetia is not such an example, as there are several spirits in the book to whom some kind of offering must be made in order to gain the spirits’ cooperation. (See both Paimon and Belial.) So this fluke is unique to Malphas, and it is worth discussing why this might be. How exactly does refusing to pay a spirit fit into a tradition that is clearly in favor of making such payments?
I posed this question to the group, and received a lot of good answers. Many of them were, admittedly, educated guesses. For example, there were several suggestions that an offering is more like a donation than a payment, and thus some spirits may choose to work for you even without a donation. In that light, perhaps, offering to make a payment (as if to a contractor) could be insulting. A couple of others suggested that a spirit working under the authority of another spirit (for example, say you have an Archangel bring a lesser spirit to you), then the lesser spirit may get his energy directly from the superior rather than from any offering you could make. While these answers didn’t delve into the nuts and bolts of the spirit tradition as I was hoping, I include them here because they are good suggestions that merit some thought.
Meanwhile, a few of the other suggestions really stood out for me—perhaps largely because they were posted by folks who have experience in other traditions (like the ATRs) that have been working with spirits in this fashion for a very long time.
One member immediately pointed out that, according to legend, the Fey will become offended if one attempts to pay them for their services. This was supported by another member who pointed out that some spirits do not wish to be fed, but instead desire payment in another form—such as doing some kind of work for them in return. I am familiar with some spirits that desire you to publicly thank them for services rendered, and even some that would rather you make a donation in their name to a charity. Thus, we can see right away that we shouldn’t allow ourselves to be trapped into a single mode of thinking: Food, candles, and incense are hardly the only appropriate payments one can make to a spirit. One could work out many kinds of deals with the entity—depending largely on the tradition and what the individual spirit wants and needs.
Finally, the conversation took a more serious turn. As our culture is taking a step back from the hard-core dualism of the past, and the fundamentalist view of all spirits as “evil,” we have sometimes made the mistake of going too far in the other direction: assuming that all spirits are “good guys.” What some of us have learned, the hard way, is that not all spirits are going to be friendly. Even if you treat them with respect and feed them. Maybe even especially then.
Yes there are spirits out there who embody nasty things like sickness, pain, anger, and death. There are spirits out there who will harm you the moment they get the chance. It is not a matter of good vs. evil—but, just like people or other wild animals, some of them are just plain jerks to whom your best interest is not a concern. In other traditions, there are spirits who are considered just plain bad that can be put to use, but are not given altars and offerings.
Frankly, this sounds a lot like how the grimoires view chthonic spirits in general. Again I point out the Book of Abramelin, which warns us against ever making the slightest offering to the spirits, or allowing them to negotiate with us in any way. It is clearly working under the assumption that every spirit is an infernal one, and treats them accordingly. Personally, I have found that not all the Abramelin spirits are willfully harmful—but some of them most certainly are (or can be)! This grimoire, more than any other, devotes some time to explaining how the spirits can—and will if you let them—gain the upper hand in their relationship with you. Therefore, its admonitions against allowing the spirits to demand anything whatsoever from you are understandable.
Another member of the Solomonic group shared an anecdote that supports this viewpoint. He once worked with the demon king Paimon (another one from the Goetia), who was being particularly stubborn during the evocation process. The spirit demanded an offering, and the practitioner went ahead and made it in the hopes of strengthening the working. Instead, it only allowed the spirit to grow stronger and more uncontrollable, and he eventually suffered negative consequences. To put it simply, he allowed the spirit to seize control of the relationship, after which it took full advantage. These spirits can bite, folks!
Other group members soon affirmed that some spirits will try to trick, cajole, threaten, or beseech you to give them offerings/payment up front so they can just take it and run. Or, even better, establish you as a gullible food-source. Just like a crooked unlicensed contractor…or maybe a televangelist. I strongly suspect this is what happened to the person who attempted to work with Paimon: the spirit simply saw an opportunity to gain the upper hand, and (in that case) it worked. Fortunately the lesson was learned.
I suspect this is also the truth behind the anomaly of Malphas in the Goetia. It is sometimes overlooked that the grimoire’s instructions are focused upon first-contact protocols; that is, it describes how to summon the spirits for the first time (cold contact), but doesn’t get into how to work with them afterward. Therefore, it is entirely possible the instruction is telling us not to make an offering to Malphas during the evocation, or else he will deceive the practitioner by taking the offering without working in return. If so, it is not likely harmful to negotiate a form of payment with the spirit to be made upon completion of the task.
In fact, tradition discourages us from making offerings to spirits before the work is done, or “just because we like them.” While a small offering can be made during an evocation, in order to attract the spirit, the full offering should be negotiated and then paid after the work is accomplished. This is just one way the practitioner can stay in charge of the relationship.
And, we must also consider when a spirit does not want or desire an offering, or if it wants something different than we assume it should. And (this is important!), we must also learn which spirits are openly hostile toward us and with whom we should either work only within strict protocols, or with whom we shouldn’t work at all. Always, always, have your head-spirit or Patron give a thumbs-up before you attempt to work with any unknown entities!
We Westerners have a lot to learn about this art! Stay safe, and stay in charge!
Our thanks to Aaron for his guest post! Visit Aaron Leitch’s author page for more information, including articles and his books.
In practice, there’s a lot of spirits who does not requires an offering. Just being respectful and sincere is very Ok at first. IMHO.
And most of times, just a candle, a incense or a flower is very Ok.
For sure, always research about the spirits who will be working.
A more complete offering, when and only is the case, is something for a special event and often this can even be to be shared with all people in the ritual.
When you do contact the spirit during the ritual, again remember not all times you will get visible/physical appearence but can have signals, dreams, etc as reply. So is always good ask if something will be accepted as a demonstration of good intentions from your part.
I like to use incense at all rituals and so usually I offer the candlelight and the aroma as a demonstration of righteousness of my intentions. And I always let the candle burn at end (except for sure at some “special” works like black magic… mwhahahahahah…)
See, I see often people may about offerings like the idea of “payment”, in the human sense. I pay, you do. This does not work so. Except for lower spirits of course.
In practice, this “payment” to often can be just being gentle, like the time and effort to prepare the ritual and get the right things, like the tools and a incense for the ritual.
People must think a bit more about when they “lust for results” and because this, they try to pay a spirit to do what they want.
But the spirits may have a different message, or a sugestion for an alternate work, etc.
About Malphas, I took sometimes searching my files to find where this was saved (computers are good and bad when you have thousands texts saved… LOL), but I found it:
John R. King at his ImperialArts journal posted a comment about Malphas, when he asked the spirit about his Goetia text description, and received this reply, I found it to be very clear, as this spirit is a powerfull one:
Question-“…It is said he deceives those who make offerings:”
Reply-“There is nothing you can do, but I can do all of what you request.”
Get this? This is why he will deceive the magician. He does not need it and expect the magician have done HIS homework before calling him, just like know who is being called.
Couldn’t agree more; the quality of your offerings is important, not how much you offer. more food is a big no in general. Instead you need to think of what you can get it/him/her that would be great in the same sense as getting someone a meaningful birthday gift.
examples are gemstones,statues etc.
https://morinoravenberg.wordpress.com/
Interesting post. I believe the Abramelin puzzle is to do with the other son whom he taught Kabbalah to.
The no-offering approach is unique to the Kabbalistic tradition, making all of this type of pseudo-jewish Christian evocation prohibited to Jews.
In Jewish Kabbalistic thought (mind you, not early polytheistic Judaism), only YHVH is given offerings. It’s a complicated subject, but in a nutshell it is tied to the creation mythos of Judaism which teaches that light constricts into manifestation, and applies to all things below Ain Soph.
Good post!
GREETINGS!!! This is one of the more finer articles I have seen in recent memory from Llewellyn.com/blog! AND ON POINT!!! As a solitary wiccan, I’m also Buddhist,and even the points you made about which spirits to make offerings to and which ones not, AND THE REASONS WHY, certainly resounded with me! Again, AN EXCELLENT ARTICLE!
Great insights. I actually hit a several month low point in evocation results when I decided to start incorporating offerings. It seemed to have an opposite effect and hindered results. I virtually gave up for a long while after years of results. In a later working it was revealed this way: that an unaccepted offering was worse then no offering at all. Also it removes you as the godhead in a way. My best results are always when I am respectful but in charge. Putting an offering in the triangle for many entities is saying , please help me…instead of calling forth a being with authority to enforce your will.
Of course I can only bring my experience, for me what has been said of King Paimon is really absurd and even offensive to the spirit itself, if the spirit does not want to show itself and you force it is normal that it will turn against you as soon as possible. .. I think we must remember that we enter their home and that the offers are what we would do if we were educated when we go to the house of others … it is normal that if you make an agreement you pay at the end of the employment relationship or part of the expenses are incurred during and this depends on the request and the same agreement … I am very shocked to see how occultists believe they can really command spirits that have a higher power … that is, they are not talking about a dead man’s spirit or of an astral shadow … perhaps to understand that the various grimoires were also written for not being easily used by anyone and that the information can be veiled or distorted as well as not having the perfect knowledge of what is done, the texts could be misinterpreted and for other it is necessary to understand the creed of provenance of the person who wrote it before starting to make experiments that can harm above all through ignorance …
you are not talking about a spirit of a dead person or an astral shadow … perhaps understand that the various libraries were also written for not being easily used by anyone and that the information can be veiled or distorted as well as not having the perfect knowledge of what you do, the texts could be badly translated and for other it is necessary to understand the creed of provenance of the person who wrote it before starting to make experiments that can harm above all through ignorance …
The loa in the vodou religion or the Santeria spirits are much more straightforward, and most have very specific likes or dislikes. You pretty much know what you’re getting when you call on one. The strategy of offerings is simple: some are thank-yous, some are requests for help, some are just to honor the spirits. You can call on them, but you can’t bend them to your will. If they want to help you, it’s not because you bribed them.