In this blog I have repeatedly pointed to the difference between what I call "true skepticism" and debunking. When a person is a true skeptic, he or she simply holds a neutral position and requires proof before accepting or rejecting a theory as to why something occurs. For example, is reincarnation a reality? For a true skeptic, the proof that goes "beyond a shadow of a doubt" simply doesn't exist. That doesn't mean reincarnation isn't a reality, just unproven. It doesn't mean we cannot act as if reincarnation is a reality and make use of information gained from past life experiences in our current life. Indeed, I believe we not only can do so, but as a hypnotherapist find it to be a very